![]() There's a learning curve, and it requires a time investment, but you can transform Reaper to be the customized DAW for the way you work. Why would you trust software that costs little over a hundred bucks to be the centerpiece of your business? Why would you trust a company that permits unlimited and uncrippled trial use of their software?īut where Pro Tools tells me "no", Reaper is a "yes" machine. IMHO, it's partly for their price and business model. Reaper is a phenomenal sound design tool that is largely overlooked. outside of their box, it's unrelentingly restrictive. But if you want to think outside of the box. Pro Tools is wonderful when you're using it per Avid's prescription of how you should use it and what you should want out of your DAW. What about customizing the keyboard to do what I need it to? Nope. Want to use some non-Avid/Digi interface? Sorry, can't do that. Want to wire Max/MSP into a track? Sorry, can't do that. Not enough.Ģ) Pro Tools is a "no" software. They do not listen to the needs of their consumers. My two big complaints are:ġ) I can't rely on Avid to make Pro Tools into the software I need, ever. I used to be a hardcore Pro Tools enthusiast, but became very disillusioned with Avid (and before that, Digidesign)'s business priorities. I use Reaper for sound editing and design and Pro Tools for mixing. I'm going to take some space here to advocate my favorite software. ![]() ![]() I have one friend who vastly prefers Nuendo, but keeps an old ProTools LE system around just so he can advertise ProTools and hope to convince them once they come in the door to just use OMF files and do the project on Nuendo.Īww man, I wish I'd popped into this conversation earlier. ![]() If you prefer the ProTools interface or need to advertise ProTools compatibility, this may be worth it to you. When you buy ProTools, you're in it for the hardware and the software, and you're going to pay more. I have nothing to urge either way, but just be aware of this distinction. I got 8 channels of 24/96 capability at a price point that would have gotten me 2 channels of 24/48 capability with ProTools. Continuing with this analogy, Final Cut Pro and all the other NLE systems can use most any suitable video hardware you can find, and many prefer the user interface of the other systems.Īll of the other DAWs besides ProTools can work with any decent audio interfaces, but ProTools will essentially lock you into their hardware. What I mean by that is that, like Avid, ProTools is more expensive for what you get, relies on more expensive proprietary hardware, and sort of got there first in the industry so a lot of people stuck with it. That being said, ProTools seems to be pretty popular in the film world. Unless you need to specifically share project files with another studio in a specific format, you can use any of these systems to make a movie, an album, or a video game. Most of the current DAW systems are highly evolved and have been continuously developed and improved for a decade or more. What it comes down to is pick one you like, and go with it, at least to start. This same discussion comes up all the time with project studio owners and musicians. The thing to realize, if you are new to digital audio workstations, is that they all do basically the same things. So the conclusion is that I need to learn and use 2 or more DAWs or sound manipulation software. Can somebody tell me about other DAWs? Are there just these three ( Nuendo, Logic Pro, Pro Tools) to use? So anyway.which DAW do you use? What other DAWs are available? I want to choose one, and start to learn. Is it practical for sound design for films, or does it have some flaws when used for sound design work? Pro Tools is good, but it is too expencive to buy the HD system for a home studio.Īnd what about Logic Pro 9. I use a Mac at home, and have tried many different DAWs, but am still perplexed as to which is the best for running on a Mac.ĭigital Performer is the best for music recording and writing, but not for designing sound, like Soundtrack Pro, but the last one is too similar to Cakewalk (now called Sonar Home Studio) to do professional work. You can manipulate the events (volume, fades, you can process effects on each event), it can open lots of video formats. It's quite good and comfortable software. I'm working in a studio, and we use Steinberg Nuendo on a PC. I'm just wondering, which DAW or software is the best and cheapest for designing sound.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |